As Southern California has recently dealt with extreme hardships due to the recent wildfires, homeowners insurance has become much more costly and unattainable to residents. For those who live in areas with the largest expected loss, premiums increased nearly 82% more than those in low risk areas. This creates an even larger challenge for the 180,000 residents who have been displaced due to the fires.
While this topic has been brought to attention due to the raging California wildfires, this has been occurring for quite some time now. Other recent disasters, such as hurricanes in the Southeast and severe storms in the Midwest, have also created significant challenges for Americans. One may wonder, how does this affect the long term wellbeing of those affected? According to CNBC, non-renewal rates in these high risk areas are 80% higher than the national average. Insurers in these areas also typically paid claims up to $5,000 more than low risk regions.
The Treasury Department released this information to the public on January 17th, with just three days before the change in administration. Officials are hopeful that the administration under President Trump can use this information to spring a plan into action that makes insurance affordable for those affected by natural disasters.
5 comments:
Every time I read something new about insurance companies I am even more confused and disappointed. I feel like their whole thing is get paid the most while helping the least. For anyone living in areas that are affected by these disasters I really hope there is some sort of relief and the whole insurance difficulties gets resolved in order for things like this to not happen again.
This is actually something that I think about every time a hurricane sweeps through the south. These families, who have probably developed deep roots in these communities, have their houses and destroyed likely multiple times. I cannot imagine how expensive it must be to live in disaster prone areas, because whether it happens or not, you are going to end up paying.
Being a California native it sucks to see wildfires wreck my state over and over again. Sadly I think it will continue due to the fact that spending money on preventatives measures for natural disasters does not increase a politicians likelihood of being reelected.
It’s surprising to see how hard it is for people in high-risk areas to get homeowners insurance. An 82% increase in premiums for areas with higher risks is a lot, and it makes me wonder how people are supposed to recover after disasters like wildfires or hurricanes. If non-renewal rates are 80% higher in these areas, it feels like insurance companies are pulling away from those who need them the most. Hopefully, there can be new policies to make insurance more affordable for families in these situations.
The rising cost of home insurance in disaster-prone areas highlights the economic concept of risk allocation. Insurers charge higher premiums to offset the increased likelihood of claims, but this creates affordability challenges for residents. As premiums rise, many may be forced to leave these areas, potentially reducing property values and local economic activity.
Post a Comment