ANALYSIS, COMMENTS, THOUGHTS, AND OTHER OBSERVATIONS IN PROF. SKOSPLES' ECONOMIC SYSTEMS COURSE AT OHIO WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
Saturday, March 24, 2012
Apple and the risks of trading 29,000 times per second
Opening a Business in Brazil Just Got Easier
However, a new law was passed in Brazil, where a single person can start a single-holder limited liability firm, with a capital requirement of $35,250. There will be some challenges along the way, such as the implementation of the law and the transition period it may take; as well as potential hostility against foreigners who will try to enter the market.
Overall, I am curious to find out the implications this law will have on Brazil's economy, with more firms entering the market and perhaps raising overall GDP for their country. Only time will tell.
http://www.economist.com/node/21543210
An Interesting Perspective on the Failure of Incentives
Wednesday, March 21, 2012
The gap widens, again
The data shows that income gaps reached extremes last experienced in the late 1920s. Currently, the top 10% of American earners brought in 46% of the nation’s salary income in 2007. "The top 0.1% alone earned over 12% of all salary income." Now in 2012, the condition could only be worse. These striking totals capped years of rising inequality. Between 1993 and 2010, over half of all real income gains in America flowed to the top 1%. Even worse, during the current recession since 2007, the income level of the bottom group has been decreasing, unemployment rate has been increasing, which cause the wealth gap augmented.
The tax action could be a way to solve this severe condition, but this piece of news thinks it is very unlikely, or highly depend on the presidential election result.
How farmer's helped transform China's economy
Caterpillar looks to fund growth in China
British Government to Issue Tax Breaks for 20 Million
This article describes the recent British attempt at tax reform. It describes two key changes being made to the British system: raising the tax-free allowance of income from £7,475 presently to £10,000 by 2015 and a reduction (from 50p to 45p) in the top tax rate. The latter will probably be controversial, as many people, both in Britain and America, believe the government coddles to the rich. The way to prevent this from happening, the British government says, is to reduce the loopholes that the rich use. This sounds like a good idea but will it have any real effect? And if so, could the United States try to reform its tax system along similar lines, specifically with making the rich more accountable?
Tuesday, March 20, 2012
The National and Regional Economic Outlook
http://www.newyorkfed.org/newsevents/speeches/2012/dud120319.html
Monday, March 19, 2012
India’s ratings agencies are thriving—without a CDO in sight
Credit-rating agencies
Letters from India
India’s ratings agencies are thriving—without a CDO in sight
Mar 17th 2012 | MUMBAI | from the print edition
THERE’S a land far from Wall Street, where credit-rating agencies are not outcasts and can look in the mirror without feeling sick. This paradise is India, with six licensed ratings agencies, the biggest of which, CRISIL, has a market value that has just soared beyond $1.3 billion. (Moody’s, one of the three big Western agencies, is worth $8.9 billion.) These outfits use the same model—the issuer of debt pays for the rating—as their counterparts in rich countries, where the resulting conflict of interest helped devastate the economy. How exactly has India got things right?
Cynics might say the rot has just not had time to set in. Debt markets are still puny and the three big agencies, CRISIL, CARE and ICRA, were all set up between 1988 and 1993 and sponsored by worthy financial firms that were often state-controlled. But India’s financial supervisor, SEBI, has also been on the ball, passing rules on agencies in 1999, about a decade before the West got serious. If an agency wants to rate bank loans it also needs permission from India’s central bank, which takes a dim view of financial gymnastics.
The rupee debt market is ring-fenced from the outside world, which may have stopped sloppy habits immigrating. And those agencies with foreign shareholders seem to be fairly independent. Standard & Poor’s owns 52% of CRISIL, a position it took in 2005, and Moody’s owns 29% of ICRA. Both American outfits rate non-rupee debt issued by Indian firms separately.
Good regulation and distance from the rest of the industry have helped, but India’s agencies have also diversified cleverly. Rather than growing by rating structured products, most firms have stretched the business to small companies and beyond. ICRA rates local-currency debt in Indonesia (it leaves hard-currency stuff to Moody’s, its shareholder). Vivek Kulkarni of Brickwork, a newish agency, says it may offer quality ratings for hospitals.
Most firms are spreading beyond ratings altogether. CARE, which had been wary, wants to develop its consultancy business “as long as we can take care of conflicts of interest,” says D.R. Dogra, its chief. Naresh Takkar, the managing director of ICRA, reckons 35-40% of its sales come from services other than ratings. CRISIL, an impressive outfit, is furthest down this path with half its sales from abroad, mainly from helping banks with equity research and risk-management models, demand for which has soared thanks to more regulation in the rich world. Its boss, Roopa Kudva, says that in the mid-1990s it downgraded lots of its ratings and saw customers pull business from it as a result. The experience helped convince it that it needed to have other income streams to protect its independence.
What might threaten ratings’ integrity today? Some fear more new entrants that might offer softer ratings to win market share. Regulators will need to watch out for opportunists tempted to enter the industry given the frothy valuations agencies now enjoy. A deal between shareholders last year valued CARE at $300m-400m, and a listing seems likely.
The other worry is the economy, which is going through its worst patch for a decade. The local system of ratings notches isn’t directly comparable with international systems, but the ratio of upgrades to downgrades is now heading towards parity, from two or more a year ago. There must be doubt about the willingness of some local agencies to pull the rug from under one of India’s big banks or business houses if it got into trouble. Such firms can be as prickly as they are powerful. And as the bond and credit-default-swaps markets expand, the stakes will get higher. Agencies will be under pressure to react faster and issuers will be hit harder if they are downgraded. India’s agencies have passed the tests of the past decade. There will be more.
from the print edition | Finance and economics
Two Steps Back
While a satellite is not necessary a weapon or a missile, the UN says the technology of a satellite is so similar to a missile that the ban on nuclear weapons should include a ban on satellites. This article relates to our class because North Korea is one of the two countries who still uses a socialist system, and it is big news if they are willing even slightly to come make agreements with the U.S. or the United Nations.
JPMorgan Cracks the Mutual Fund Top 10
http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-03-15/jpmorgan-cracks-the-mutual-fund-top-10
Sunday, March 18, 2012
Cambodia Embracing Capitalism With First IPO Since Khmer Rouge
Private Health Insurance is Inefficient
Zakaria's article discusses health insurance and how health insurance should not be privatized because the public sector provides it in a more inefficient way. The article didn't discuss topics which are normally brought up in this argument including that the private market creates more competition which improves the quality of our health care and personnel in the field. It mainly focused on administration costs for health care which I have never looked into. The numbers are staggering showing that most private administration costs are about 30% of the money they charge you, while the public market administration costs are about 6%. It is because of these numbers that Zakaria claims the public sector is more efficient when it comes to health care.
Are Jobs Obsolete?
The writer of this article suggests that employment does not need to be "productive" in the sense that it used to be. Instead, more people can concentrate on creative endeavors like writing books. However, it does little to address those who are not needed in the production of necessities, but who are also not well suited to these kinds of pursuits.
http://edition.cnn.com/2011/OPINION/09/07/rushkoff.jobs.obsolete/