According
to this article, more than 200,000 jobs have been added to payrolls for the
third straight month. Although the unemployment rate remained 8.3%, it is much
lower from the 9% at a year ago. Moreover, the so-called underemployment rate
has dropped from 16% in October to 14.9% last month. This strong February jobs
report indicates that the economy is steadily improved. Some economists/professionals
pointed out that this could be a signal showing that there is no need for more
QE, quantitative easing.(Since the finance crisis of 2008, the Fed has bought
about $1.6 trillion in Treasury bonds in order to keep long-term rates low.) Alternatively,
the Fed could buy more long-term bonds and then borrow the money back from
investors; it could limit criticism saying that the Fed is fueling inflation by
printing more money. On the other hand, some other economists/professionals
held a more cautious attitude. Michael Materasso, senior vice president and
co-chair of the fixed income policy committee at Franklin Templeton in New
York, concluded that jobs gains are encouraging and the Fed should acknowledge
that, but the Fed (might) still want to do QE3 as a concern of the still weak
housing market.
1 comment:
I disagree with Michael Materasso’s suggestion to still use QE3 as a concern of the still weak housing market because quantitative easing could actually make things worse in the housing market. This could essentially create another housing bubble where Americans can’t afford their homes. Additionally, with the criticism mentioned about inflation, the value of the dollar could be damaged, there could be a decrease in consumer confidence, and the global financial system could be destabilized. Also, with high inflation, businesses could be less willing to invest, which could also decrease their growth and employment. It seems as though the better solution would be to not use quantitative easing.
Post a Comment