Monday, August 31, 2020

 https://theweek.com/articles/925458/coronavirus-crisis-capitalism


In this article, Noah Millman analyzes the impact of recent government assistance programs and how these policies demonstrate the complexities of a capitalist economy that leans heavily on government aid. The author recounts a recent encounter with a restaurant owner who explained the effects the government’s loan has had on the restaurant industry. This restaurant owner, who Millman met because she was doubling as a waitress, explained that the government assistance deterred restaurant employees from coming to work. Although working, while still receiving government assistance, would increase employee’s pay, the risk of coronavirus infection from waiting tables dissuaded employees from coming to work. Additionally, because fewer customers are visiting restaurants, a limited supply of tables minimizes money from tips. However, even if the current government payouts are sufficient to keep workers at home, this solution is not sustainable. Because the government’s rationale behind their financial support for small business employees was to “freeze” the economy temporarily, while medical experts figured out how to solve the pandemic, it is clear this process cannot work much longer. With the death tolls of coronavirus rising, and no end to the pandemic in sight, the government cannot afford to offer this level of assistance forever.


The struggle to contain the virus, while helping usher employees back to work illustrates not only an economic dilemma, but a moral one. Millman captures this point succinctly: “On what basis can the government ever legitimately say: wait tables or you won't eat?” Because the government wants to ensure workers are being taken care of financially, it will likely continue to spend on their behalf. However, this approach undermines the root of capitalism — that a free market, without government assistance will naturally produce the goods and services society desires. Unfortunately, because of the moral concerns of forcing employees to go back to work, a capitalist model is insufficient to correct the economic pains of the coronavirus. Of course, restricting government assistance is not the remedy either, as this form of financial relief is the only backbone many Americans have. Yet, because such a solution cannot last forever, the government’s policy and financial guidance must be meticulously guided, understanding the weight each piece of fiscal policy carries in the pandemic. 



2 comments:

Marya Gakosso said...

One important point that I am taking away from your post is how the capitalist system of this country has somewhat failed to provide effective and sufficient assistance to a lot of people and companies dealing with these consequent economic pains. I believe that the COVID-19 has amplified or perhaps even revealed some of the faults in our economic system. Inarguably there are numerous strengths to capitalism, but unfortunately, these are not working for many low-income and/or low-skill workers. Minority groups mostly, who have been shown to be the most affected by the pandemic, economically but also in different areas such as health care. In the end, I think that this should lead us to question whether equity/equality can truly exist in such a system, and if not, what steps are to be taken to successfully adjust it.

Max Beard said...

Marya, I agree with your analysis of the article and the idea that a capitalist system is not able to solve all our problems — especially regarding equity and equality. I think your point is important to note: minorities are being affected disproportionately by Covid. The CDC has highlighted this issue (https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/health-equity/race-ethnicity.html), as they note that pre-existing poverty and worse access to healthcare exacerbates this issue. Because minorities are more likely to work in essential businesses, where exposure to the public is more prevalent, Covid hurts these communities more greatly. Additionally, the CDC believes that historic discrimination leads to chronic stress (an actual medical condition), which serves as another factor that influences minority health struggles against Covid.