Sunday, September 27, 2015

A Giant Drinks Merger: Beer Monster

http://www.economist.com/news/business/21665074-ab-inbev-may-combine-sabmiller-flat-market-big-beer-brands-beer-monster


On September 16, 2015, SABMiller, the worlds second largest brewing company, announced that it was being courted by AB InBev, the worlds largest brewing company. This comes at a time when craft breweries are gaining traction while the large beer companies are loosing customer.  InBev, the worlds largest brewing company began back in 1989 when Jorge Paulo Lehmann and his two partners bought a Brazilian beer company called Brahma for $50 million. Brahma acquired one of their rivals, Antarctica ten years later and became AmBev.. Then in 2004, AmBev merged with Interbrew, a Belgian company that owned Stella Artois and Beck’s and InBev was created. In 2008, InBev acquired Anheuser-Busch, a United States company, for $52 Billion and their expansion did not stop there. In 2012, InBev paid $20 billion for Grupo Modelo, a Mexican company, fortifying their position as the largest brewing company in the world. Now there is talk of a merger between the two largest brewing companies in the world, which would bring the beer industry closer to a monopolized industry. If the two firms do merge, they would account for roughly half of the industries profits. Because the two firms would be so dominate in the beer market, antitrust regulators are a barrier for the merger. One way that to appease regulators is for each of the companies to drop some of their smaller acquisitions. This would make it more of an even playing field.The merger is not for certain, but relatively likely. InBev has been able to increase the profitability of the companies that it has aqucired and SABMiller has been having problems recently. A merger might be what SABMiller needs to heal itself. But if the merger goes through, the massive conglomerate would gain more market power and might be able to drive prices up, increasing the producer surplus while decreasing the consumer surplus. 

No comments: